Do you, personally, get anything out of a three year lectionary?

I have been recently following the Sacra Doctrina Project, theological consortium. On a recent podcast of theirs one topic that was discussed was the three year lectionary of the reformed mass.

One of the hosts brought up a point that one of his former teachers, Fr. Thomas Petri O.P.(President of the Pontifical Faculty at the Dominican House of Studies, one of the top Thomist faculties in the world), made on twitter: the three year lectionary hasn't worked because it doesn't make pedagogical sense. It's virtually impossible to foster any sense of familiarity or understanding for anything that's done on a trianual basis. I made me realize that on Sundays it can feel as if I'm hearing the readings for the first time, which goes against the idea of more scripture = greater understanding of the bible.

I'm not trying to be polemical. While I personally find these arguments convincing based on their logic and from personal experience, I also know that people tend to like the three year lectionary. I was wondering if anyone has felt that a three year lectionary has increased their understanding or knowledge of scripture. Perhaps if you're the sort to plan ahead or take notes on the upcoming readings for Sunday, after three years you would have a frame of reference to fall back on, but I would think that this method wasn't envisioned when the liturgy was being reformed.